delim @@
| 5i'
TUP TEST SPECIFICATION
This Recommendation contains a set of detailed tests for the Signalling System No. 7 Telephony User Part (TUP). These tests are intended to validate the protocol specified in Q.721-Q.724 Recommendations. This Recommendation conforms to Q.780 Recommendations which describes the basic rules of the test specification.
The TUP tests aim at testing TUP protocol conformance in a given implementation. The tests are described as ``Validation'' tests or ``Validation'' and ``Compatibility'' tests. Each test description indicates in the field ``type of test'' whether the test is ``Validation'' or ``Validation'' and ``Compatibility''. As the TUP also describes the required call control actions resulting from TUP message transfer the TUP tester also checks the result of those call control actions, e.g. that speech/information transfer is possible.
A stable signalling relation is required between ``SP A'' and ``SP B'' in order to effectively test the TUP. In addition telephony circuits are required for some of the tests.
All tests may be validation tests. Tests marked ``*'' are compatibility tests. Tests marked ``fs'' are for further study.
1 Circuit supervision
* 1.1 Non allocated circuits
1.2 Reset of circuits
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 1
|
1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.3 1.2.4 1.3 1.3.1 1.3.1.1 1.3.1.2 |
RSC received on an idle circuit RSC sent on an idle circuit Group reset received Group reset sent Blocking of circuits Group blocking/unblocking HGB received HGB sent |
|||
|
* * |
1.3.1.3 1.3.1.4 1.3.2 |
MGB received MGB sent Circuit blocking/unblocking |
||
|
* * * |
1.3.2.1 1.3.2.2 1.3.2.3 1.3.2.4 |
BLO received BLO sent Circuit blocking from both ends; removal of blocking from one end Interruption for FDM circuits |
||
|
2 |
Fascicle |
VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
|
* * |
1.4 1.4.1 1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 1.5 1.5.1 2 2.1 |
Continuity check test call CCTC received: successful CCTC sent: successful CCTC received: unsuccessful CCTC sent: unsuccessful Receipt of unreasonable signalling information Received Normal call set-up Both way circuit selection |
|||
|
* * |
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 |
IAM sent by controlling SP IAM sent by non controlling SP Called address sending |
|||
|
* * |
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3 2.3.1 |
``en bloc'' operation Overlap operation Successful call set-up Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS) |
|||
|
* * * * |
2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 3 |
Call switched via satellite Test for echo suppressor call set-up Blocking and unblocking during a call (initiated) Blocking and unblocking during a call (received) Normal call release |
|||
|
* * |
3.1 3.2 |
Calling party clears: before ACM Calling party clears: before ANS |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 3 |
|
* * * |
4 |
3.3 3.4 3.5 |
Calling party clears: after ANS Calling party clears: after CLEAR BACK Reanswer Unsuccessful set-up |
|
4 |
4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.3 4.3.1 4.3.2 Fascicle |
SEC SEC received SEC sent CGC CGCreceived CGC sent NNC NNC received NNC sent VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
|
* * |
4.4 4.4.1 4.4.2 4.5 4.5.1 4.5.2 4.6 |
ADI ADI received ADI sent CFL CFL received CFL sent SSB |
|||
|
* * |
4.6.1 4.6.2 4.7 |
SSB received SSB sent UNN |
|||
|
* * |
4.7.1 4.7.2 4.8 4.8.1 4.8.2 4.9 4.9.1 4.9.2 4.10 4.10.1 4.10.2 4.11 4.11.1 4.11.2 5 |
UNN received UNN sent LOS LOS received LOS sent SST SST received SST sent ACB ACB received ACB sent DPN DPN received DPN sent Abnormal situation during a call |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 5 |
|
5.1 5.2 5.3 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 5.3.4 5.3.5 |
Inability to release in response to a CLF Inability to release in response to a backward signal Timers T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 |
|||
|
* * |
5.3.6 5.3.7 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 |
ANS signal not received (Q.118 Timer) Delay in clearing by calling party (Q.118 Timer) Reset of circuits during a call Of an outgoing circuit Of an incoming circuit |
||
|
6 |
Fascicle |
VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
|
5.5 Receipt of unreasonable signalling information 5.5.1 (Now test No. 1.5.1) |
|||
|
fs |
5.5.2 Received 5.6 Interruption of signalling relation 6 Special call set-up 6.1 Continuity check call |
||
|
* * * |
6.1.1 COT applied on an outgoing circuit 6.1.2 COT applied on previous circuit 6.1.3 COT on a satellite circuit 6.1.4 Calling party clears during a COT |
||
|
* |
6.1.5 Delay of through connect 6.1.6 COT unsuccessful 6.1.7 COT received on incoming circuit 6.2 Automatic repeat attempt 6.2.1 Dual seizure 6.2.2 Circuit reset 6.2.3 Reception of unreasonable signal information |
||
|
* |
6.2.4 Blocking of the circuit 6.2.5 Continuity check failure 6.3 Dual seizure 6.3.1 Dual seizure for controlling side 7 Supplementary services |
||
|
fs fs |
7.1 CUG 7.2 User access to the calling line identity |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 7 |
|
fs fs fs fs |
8 |
7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 |
User access to the called line identity Redirection of calls CCBS Network access to calling line identity Performance tests |
|
Note -- For further study. |
|||
|
8 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Figure 1/Q.783, p. |
H.T. [T1.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Circuit supervision _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Non-allocated circuits
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a CIC relating to a circuit which does not exist, SP A will discard the message and alert maintenance personnel
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that the CIC identifies a circuit that does not exist between SP A and SP B
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send an initial address message. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | { CHECK C: WAS THE INDICATION GIVEN TO THE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL? | | | | | | |
||
|
Tableau [T1.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 9 |
H.T. [T2.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.2.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.15.1 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Reset of circuits _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: RSC received on an idle circuit
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of a reset circuit signal SP A will respond by sending a release guard signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The circuit is idle
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RSC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a reset-circuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK { CHECK |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
10 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T2.783], p. |
H.T. [T3.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.2.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.15.1 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Reset of circuits _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: RSC sent on an idle circuit
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate reset-circuit signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The circuit is idle
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RSC -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a reset-circuit signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|||
|
Tableau [T3.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 11 |
H.T. [T4.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.2.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.15.2 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Reset of circuits _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Group reset received
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds, SP A will respond by sending a circuit reset acknowledge message
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- GRS lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- GRS lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . GRA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK { CHECK |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
12 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T4.783], p. |
H.T. [T5.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.2.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.15.2 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Reset of circuits _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: Group reset sent _ lw(228p) .
|
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group reset message } _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP |
|
|
_ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A GRS -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . GRS -------------------------> |
SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
<------------------------- GRA _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two circuit group reset messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT GROUP IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|||
|
Tableau [T5.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 13 |
H.T. [T6.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.2 _ lw(228p) .
|
{ TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking } _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: HGB received _ lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that the hardware failure group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP |
|
_ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A |
SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
<------------------------- HGB lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGB lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HBA -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGU lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- HGU lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HUA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | |
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
14 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T6.783], p. |
H.T. [T7.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.2 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: HGB sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both hardware failure oriented group blocking messages and hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGB -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGB -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HGB lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGU -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . HGU -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- HUA _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE HGB MESSAGE
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two hardware failure oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUIT INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | |
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T7.783], p. 15 |
H.T. [T8.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: MGB received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the maintenance oriented group blocking procedure can be correctly initiated
|
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A <------------------------- MGB lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MBA -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- <------------------------- MGU lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MUA -------------------------> |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGB lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGU lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST |
DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP B to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | |
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
16 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T8.783], p. |
H.T. [T9.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.1.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Group blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: MGB sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate both maintenance oriented group blocking messages and maintenance oriented group unblocking messages
|
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A MGB -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGB -------------------------> <------------------------- MGA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . MGU -------------------------> MGU -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- MUA |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST |
DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group blocking messages within a period of 5 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THE CIRCUITS INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD IN THE MGB MESSAGE
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send two maintenance oriented group unblocking messages within a period of 5 seconds.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON INDICATED BY THE RANGE FIELD } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ |
THE |
CIRCUIT |
Tableau [T9.783], p.
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 17
H.T. [T10.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.1 _ lw(228p) .
|
{ TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking } _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: BLO received _ lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated } _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF |
|
SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A |
SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
<------------------------- BLO lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- UBL lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } _ |
{ CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP B ON THIS CIRCUIT { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER EXCHANGE ON THIS CIRCUIT { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
||
|
Tableau [T10.783], p. |
18 Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783
H.T. [T11.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: BLO sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate blocking messages
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL ------------------------->
|
lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. { CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THIS CIRCUIT } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE ORIGINATED FROM EITHER SP ON THIS CIRCUIT } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS SHOWN ABOVE? | | | | | | } _ |
_ cw(18p) | |
Tableau [T11.783], p.
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 19
H.T. [T12.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5.1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Blocking from both ends: removal of blocking from one end
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the blocking/unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- BLO lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL ------------------------->
lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBL lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP A to send a blocking signal. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. } _ |
{ CHECK A: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED FROM SP A ON THIS CIRCUIT { Arrange for SP B to send a blocking signal. { CHECK B: VERIFY THAT A CALL CANNOT BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY EITHER SP { Arrange for SP A to send an unblocking signal. { CHECK C: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED BY SP B { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
||
|
Tableau [T12.783], p. |
20 Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783
H.T. [T13.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.3.2.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 9.2 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Circuit blocking/unblocking
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Interruption from FDM circuits
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify th at an interruption of the pilot in FDM system causes a blocking signal to be sent
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: The signa lling points must be linked by a transmission system using FDM
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- UBA _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for the reception of the pilot signal at SP A to be interrupted more than 4-15 seconds. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
4. |
{ CHECK A: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CANNOT BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP { Arrange for the interruption of the pilot tone to be terminated. { CHECK B: CONFIRM THAT A CALL CAN BE INITIATED BY EITHER SP AFTER A PERIOD OF |
||
|
4-15 SECONDS } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|||
|
} _ |
||||
|
Tableau [T13.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 21 |
H.T. [T14.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.4.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 7.5 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Continuity check test call
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: CCTC received: Successful
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed
|
} _ lw(228p) . { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Circuit must be idle } _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: |
1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED |
|
MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | |
SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CCR |
| (hy---------------------------------------
} Check tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | fR
| (hy---------------------------------------
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK { CHECK |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
22 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T14.783], p. |
H.T. [T15.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.4.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 7.5 _ lw(228p) .
|
{ TITLE: Continuity check test call } _ lw(228p) . { SUBTITLE: CCTC sent: successful } _ lw(228p) . { PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly performed } _ lw(228p) . { PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Circuit must be idle } _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT |
and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED |
|
MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check Tone { ---------------------------------------- | | |
| lw(72p) . CCR -------------------------> lw(72p) | |
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { ---------------------------------------- | f | fR
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|||
|
Tableau [T15.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 23 |
H.T. [T16.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.4.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 7.5 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Continuity check test call
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: CCTC received: unsuccessful
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify tha t the continuity check procedure can be correctly received
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Ensure th at no backward check tone is detected within the specified time out
|
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A |
-- |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SP B lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- -- CCR lw(72p) | |
||
|
lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } -- Check tone lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | fR | (hy------- } lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- |
-- CCF lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . | lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
|||
|
1-3 minutes | T10 lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | (hy--------------------------------------- } Check tone lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | fR | (hy------- } lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- |
| lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- -- CCR lw(72p) | -- CCF lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . | lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
Maintenance staff alerted 1-3 minutes | T10 lw(72p) | rw(84p) | lw(72p) . | lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- -- CCR lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { |
| (hy---------------------------------------
} Check tone lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | fR
|
| (hy------------- } lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- |
CCF _ lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION |
_ cw(18p) | |
lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. CHECK? | | | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. |
{ CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } _ |
{ CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
Tableau [T16.783], p. |
24 Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783
H.T. [T17.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.4.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 7.5.3 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Continuity check test call
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: CCTC sent: unsuccessful
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify th at the continuity test call procedure can be correctly invoked
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Ensure th at no backward tone is detected within the specified timeout
|
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP lw(72p) . Check tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { -------------- | f | fR } lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF -- -------------------------> |
TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
|
|
{ T10 | T10 | 1-3 minutes T10 | |
|
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR -- -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check tone { ---------------------------------------- | | } lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { --------------- | f | fR } lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF -- -------------------------> lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . { T10 | T10 | 1-3 minutes T10 | |
lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
} Maintenance staff alerted lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCR -- -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Check tone
{ ---------------------------------------- | |
|
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { --------------- | f | fR } lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CCF -------------------------> |
lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . |
_ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST |
DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Initiate the continuity test call procedure at SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. CHECK? | | | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. |
{ CHECK A: WAS THE SECOND CONTINUITY CHECK INITIATED WITHIN 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WERE THE MAINTENANCE STAFF ALERTED ON FAILURE OF THE SECOND CONTINUITY { CHECK C: WAS THE CHECK REPEATED AT INTERVALS OF 1 TO 3 MINUTES? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } _ |
{ CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
Tableau [T17.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 25 |
H.T. [T18.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 1.5.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 6.5 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Receipt of unreasonable information
} _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: Received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the action taken by a signalling point upon receipt of unreasonable signalling information is as stated in Q.724 § 6.5
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Arrange the data in signalling point B such that CLF, RLG, and UBL messages may be initiated b) The circuit should be idle and unblocked
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . a) lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . b) lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . c) <------------------------- UBL lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Arrange for SP B to send a clear forward signal.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. } |
{ CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN a) ABOVE? | | | | | | { Arrange for SP B to send a release guard signal. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN b) ABOVE? | | | | | | { Arrange for SP B to send an unblocking signal. { CHECK E: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS IN c) ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
Note -- This test covers only some of the ambiguous messages which could be received. |
||
|
Tableau [T18.783], p. |
||
|
26 Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
H.T. [T19.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.1.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Both way circuit selection
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: IAM sent by controlling SP
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the controlling SP is A
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.2 d) SP A is the controlling signalling point
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A TO SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } _ |
{ CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|||
|
Tableau [T19.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 27 |
H.T. [T20.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.1.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Bothway circuit selection
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: IAM sent by non-controlling SP
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate an outgoing call on a circuit capable of bothway operation when the non-controlling SP is A
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) Circuit selected is capable of bothway operation c) Circuit selected is as in test number 2.1.1 d) SP B is the controlling signalling point
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } _ |
{ CHECK { The { CHECK { The { CHECK { CHECK |
{ CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
|
|
28 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T20.783], p. |
H.T. [T21.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.2.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Called address sending
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: ``EN BLOC'' operation
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully established (all digits included in the IAM)
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The exchange data is arranged such that all digits are included in the IAM
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction Where SPA is in a position to know, by digit analysis |
that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an End-of-pulsing (ST) signal is included in the IAM.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T21.783], p. 29 |
H.T. [T22.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.2.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Called address sending
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Overlap operation (with SAM and SAO)
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A can initiate a call using an IAM followed by SAM and a SAO
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that digits are generated in an IAM followed by a SAM and a SAO
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SAO -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. Note -- The message flow may not be as above |
(There may be various SAMs and SAOs).
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { Where SPA is in a position to know by digit analysis that the final digit has been sent. Confirm that an end-of-pulsing (ST) signal is included in the last address message.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
30 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T22.783], p. |
H.T. [T23.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.3.1 _ lw(228p) .
{ REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.6 and 1.10
} _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Successful call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Ordinary call (with various ACM and ANS)
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully completed using various combinations of address complete messages and answer messages
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
{ CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Repeat steps 1-7 with all combinations of bits A&B in the address complete message. { Repeat steps 1-8 with ANC replaced with an ANN. |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { Repeat this test in the reverse direction.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T23.783], p. 31 |
H.T. [T24.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.3.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Successful call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Call switched via a satellite
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify the satellite indicator in the initial address message is correctly set
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is switched via a satellite connection or has a satellite connection already included in the path
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. } _ |
{ CHECK { The { CHECK { The { CHECK { CHECK { CHECK { For |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { CHECK E: WAS THE SATELLITE INDICATOR BIT IN THE IAM SET TO 1? | | | | | | { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction? | | | | | | |
|
|
32 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T24.783], p. |
H.T. [T25.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.3.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 11 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Successful call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Test for echo suppressor call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that a call can be successfully established with the inclusion of echo suppressors
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: a) Called termination is free b) The signalling point data is arranged such that the call is routed over a route requiring echo suppressors or already has an echo suppressor included in the connection
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { CHECK C: IS ECHO PERCEIVED BY EITHER PARTY? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT G (OUTGOING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) |
IN THE IAM SET TO 1? | | | | | |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK G: WAS THE MESSAGE INDICATOR BIT D (INCOMING HALF ECHO SUPPRESSOR INCLUDED) IN THE ACM SET TO 1? | | | | | |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T25.783], p. 33 |
H.T. [T26.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.3.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Successful call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Blocking and unblocking during a call (initiated)
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly initiated during a call
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLO -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLA lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBL -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- UBA _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
{ CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { SP A should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP A? | | | | | | { SP A should send an unblocking signal. |
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK FROM EITHER SP. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { CHECK |
{ CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
||
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 12. { Repeat } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . { Note } _ |
{ Repeat this test in the reverse direction. { Note -- The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. |
||
|
Tableau [T26.783], p. |
|||
|
34 Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
H.T. [T27.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 2.3.5 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 5 _ lw(228p) .
{ TITLE: Successful call set-up
} _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Blocking and unblocking during a call (received)
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the circuit blocking and unblocking procedure can be correctly received during a call
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- BLO lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . BLA -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- UBL lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . UBA -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
{ CHECK A: CAN RINGING TONE BE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { SP B should initiate circuit blocking relating to the circuit used for this call. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK D: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN ONLY BE ORIGINATED ON THIS CIRCUIT BY SP B? | | | | | | { SP B should send an unblocking signal. |
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. FROM EITHER SP. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. |
{ CHECK E: VERIFY THAT A CALL CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY ORIGINATED { CHECK F: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | |
||
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 12. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } _ |
{ Repeat this test in the reverse direction. { Note -- The blocking signal may be generated after the call has cleared. |
||
|
Tableau [T27.783], p. |
|||
|
Fascicle VI.9 |
-- Rec. Q.783 35 |
H.T. [T28.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 3.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.14 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Normal call release _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Calling party clears before address complete
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of an address complete message
} _ lw(228p) . PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } _ |
{ The { CHECK { CHECK { Repeat |
{ The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of the address complete signal. { CHECK A: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK B: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Repeat this test in the reverse direction. |
|
|
36 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T28.783], p. |
H.T. [T29.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 3.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.14 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Normal call release _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Calling party clears before answer
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call prior to receipt of answer
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call prior to receipt of an answer signal. { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. |
|||
|
Tableau [T29.783], p. |
||||
|
Fascicle |
VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 37 |
H.T. [T30.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 3.3 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.14 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Normal call release _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Calling party clears after answer
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the speech state
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. } _ |
{ CHECK { The { CHECK { The { CHECK { CHECK { For |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing this test should be repeated in the reverse direction. |
|
|
38 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. |
Q.783 |
Tableau [T30.783], p. |
H.T. [T31.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 3.4 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.14 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Normal call release _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Called party clears
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the calling party can successfully release a call in the clear back state
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CBK lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1.
{ Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 5. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 6. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 7. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 8. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 9. } _ |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The called party should clear the call. { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK C: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | { CHECK D: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. |
|||
|
Tableau [T31.783], p. Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 39 |
H.T. [T32.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 3.5 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.14 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: Normal call release _ lw(228p) .
{ SUBTITLE: Called party clears and reanswers
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the called subscriber can successfully clear and reanswer a call in the speech state
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Called termination is free
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ACM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . { | | fR ----------------------------------------
} Ringing tone lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ANC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CBK lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RAN lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . Speech { --------------------------
} Speech lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. |
{ CHECK A: IS RINGING TONE HEARD? | | | | | | { The called party should answer the call. { CHECK B: IS SPEECH POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The called party should clear the call. { The called party should reanswer the call. { CHECK C: IS SPEECH STILL POSSIBLE? | | | | | | { The calling party should clear the call. { CHECK D: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
} cw(18p) } cw(18p) } _ |
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 10. { CHECK } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 11. { For } _ |
{ CHECK E: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { For validation testing repeat this test in the reverse direction. |
||
|
40 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T32.783], p. |
H.T. [T33.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.1.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: SEC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: SEC received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a switching equipment congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- SEC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T33.783], p. 41 |
H.T. [T34.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.1.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: SEC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: SEC sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a switching equipment congestion message
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP A such that switching equipment congestion is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . SEC -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence with a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
42 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T34.783], p. |
H.T. [T35.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.2.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: CGC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: CGC received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that a call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a circuit group congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CGC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . CGC signal is sent. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T35.783], p. 43 |
H.T. [T36.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.2.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: CGC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: CGC sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a circuit group congestion signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a circuit group congestion signal is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CGC -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . CGC signal is sent. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
44 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T36.783], p. |
H.T. [T37.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.3.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q. 724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: NNC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: NNC received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a national network congestion signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP B such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- NNC lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . NNC signal is sent. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T37.783], p. 45 |
H.T. [T38.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.3.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.8 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: NNC _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: NNC sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that SP A is able to generate a national network congestion signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point A such that a national network congestion signal is returned to the call request, where SP A is now an I/C exchange
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . NNC -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . NNC signal is sent. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal (without subscriber free) may be sent in the backward direction before a { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
46 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T38.783], p. |
H.T. [T39.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.4.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.7 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: ADI _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: ADI received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that on receipt of an address incomplete message the call is immediately released and the correct indication given to the calling party
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Signalling point B should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- ADI lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP A to SP B, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T39.783], p. 47 |
H.T. [T40.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.4.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 1.7 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: ADI _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: ADI sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate an address incomplete signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: SP A should be able to determine that the proper number of digits has not been received
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT and CPT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . ADI -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Make a call from SP B to SP A, but do not enter the final digit. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: WAS THE CORRECT TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT SENT TO THE CALLING SUBSCRIBER? | | | { CHECK B: IS THE CIRCUIT IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
48 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T40.783], p. |
H.T. [T41.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.5.1 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 6.3 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: CFL _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: CFL received _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that the call will be immediately released by the outgoing signalling point if a call failure signal is received and the correct indication is given to the calling party
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in signalling point B such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . IAM -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CFL lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CLF -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) .
<------------------------- RLG _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP A to SP B. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
|||
|
Tableau Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T41.783], p. 49 |
H.T. [T42.783]
TUP LEVEL 4 TEST SPECIFICATION
center box; lw(228p) . TEST NUMBER: 4.5.2 _ lw(228p) . REFERENCE: Q.724 § 6.3 _ lw(228p) . TITLE: CFL _ lw(228p) . SUBTITLE: CFL sent _ lw(228p) .
{ PURPOSE: To verify that signalling point A is able to generate a call failure signal
} _ lw(228p) .
{ PRE-TEST CONDITIONS: Arrange the data in SP A such that a call failure signal is returned to the call request
} _ cw(72p) | cw(84p) | cw(72p) . CONFIGURATION: 1 TYPE OF TEST: VAT TYPE OF SP: SP _ lw(228p) . EXPECTED MESSAGE SEQUENCE: lw(72p) | lw(84p) | lw(72p) . SP A SP B lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- IAM lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . CFL -------------------------> lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . <------------------------- CLF lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . RLG -------------------------> _ lw(72p) | cw(84p) | lw(72p) . TEST DESCRIPTION _ cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 1. { Attempt to make a call from SP B to SP A. Record the message sequence using a signal monitor.
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 2. | | | | } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 3. |
{ CHECK A: IS THE APPROPRIATE TONE OR ANNOUNCEMENT RETURNED TO THE CALLING PARTY? | | { CHECK B: IS THE CALL IDLE? | | | | | | |
|
|
} cw(18p) | lw(210p) . 4. } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . } cw(18p) | lw(210p) . |
{ CHECK C: WAS THE MESSAGE SEQUENCE AS ABOVE? | | | | | | { Note 1 -- An address complete signal may be sent in the backward direction before a CFL signal is sent. { Note 2 -- It may not be possible to confirm that the appropriate tone is returned to the calling party. In this case it |
must be verified that the signalling point under test retransmits the signal received.
|
} _ |
} _ |
||
|
50 |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 |
Tableau [T42.783], p. |
Fascicle VI.9 -- Rec. Q.783 51